Table of Contents
Updated with new posts...
Posts should be read in chronological order.
On the Nature and Crafting of Belief in the Elite’s Struggle for Power and Control
Section 0: “Preface”, available here
Section 1, “Introduction”, describes what most people want in life and the disconnect between their hopes/dreams and what they receive. Part 1 and Part 2
Section 2, “The Dissemination of Information in Technological Society”, looks at how information is created and disseminated and why people choose to believe it. Part 1 , Part 2 , Part 3
Section 3, “Dissonance to Information Control in Technological Society”, explores the rise of cognitive dissonance to establishment propaganda and what types of people are more likely to experience it and why. Part 1 , Part 2 , Part 3 , Part 4 , Part 5 , Part 6
Section 4, “Goals, Motivations and Strategies of the Owners of Modern Society”, argues that a handful of families own the central banks of the world and control society via unlimited fiat monetary printing. It offers a historical and psychological framework for their behavior and investigates their objectives. Part 1 , Part 2 , Part 3
Section 5, “Deeper Societal Trends Predating the Central Banks”, analyzes the modern and historical relationships between Judaism, Christianity, and Hellenism and contrasts their values and beliefs, and explores how civilizational values are retained from millennia-old conflicts. Part 1 , Part 2
Section 6, “Suggestions and Takeaways”, looks at currently perceived alternatives to our globalized system and offers various conclusions. Part 1 , Part 2
Appendix A provides a brief history of central-bank initiated wars.
Appendix B addresses a caveat to the willpower behind the central bank system by discussing the rise of a perpetuating capitalist matrix.
An excellent overview! Education is the key. Note that you could "pin" this index post so it stays at the top of your page.
Thank you for this well documented essay / compilation.
It took me time to go through all the individual articles. I wish myself more available time to dig into the reference material you provide. I do not, unconditionally, agree with your line of thought. I do however, agree with you that « we have a severe problem with our « banking systemS ». Part of my « reluctance » to buy your elaborate thesis leverages on the fact that you avoid (perhaps I missed it) to address « our own responsibility ».
To make a long story short, one simple example: we « ALL KNOW » there is « war against cash » going on using fallacious arguments ranging from « a 1$ bill can carry a disease » to « maintaining cash costs a fortune » and so on.
However
- we KNOW that a cash free society will be prone to state control (IRS and some social-democrats (in the European meaning of the word) will like it !)
- we also KNOW that by not using cash anymore we exchange some degree of freedom against some convenience.
- yet, we all play the game, myself often included every time I’m not using cash.
If we would DISLIKE the idea of being controlled (being a victim) on our expenses, we could just be using cash all the time. Remember, we all KNOW.
I wonder if there exists a cognitive bias our brain is specifically wired for that pushes us to accept, conveniently, narratives that help to evacuate our own responsibility. Conspiration theories get audience; « they are all responsible, I’m a victim » regardless of the topic. I’m not suggesting your thesis goes along such lines, I’m however wondering why your documented portrait gets away with what seems to be « one of our intrinsic « weakness.
kind regard, Philippe Lerch