Suggestions and Takeaways: Part 2
Perspective shifts and reasons for hope
Continued from Part 1…
This part offers some takeaways from this essay, which are much more about perspective re-alignment than calls for concrete action.
TAKEAWAYS AND REASONS FOR HOPE
Writing this essay has been like wiping ten layers of dirt off an old book.1 People in prior generations hadn’t suffered nearly as much virulent, pervasive, sophisticated and sustained propaganda as what we have experienced today. Testosterone levels were higher, people were a healthy weight, average IQs were 14 points higher, they were more religious, more community oriented, and hadn’t undergone the process of media indoctrination that turned people who consumed it into zombie-like NPCs. Today, most people don’t have a clue where to start in determining what their interests are. As Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov observed, the West has been the victim of an extreme, long-term strategy of ideological subversion: “What it basically means is: [a deliberate effort] to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”
This essay has attempted to explain to ideological dissidents how our elites attempt to confuse them what their interests are. It has attempted to provide mostly descriptive as opposed to prescriptive arguments, documenting each step in the chain of reasoning employed, arguing consequentially based on evidence and logic and not deontologically based on faith, for the reader to agree with or disagree with using his own discernment and conscience.
The following are some general takeaways that hopefully may be of some use.
Takeaway #1: A theory about society should ultimately be judged by its predictive value.
If societal trends have been properly considered and analyzed, it should have predictive value about the future. The mainstream perspective of history as progress, known as Whig history, woefully fails to explain the decline of America or the west generally, especially since the 1970s when average wages peaked. Francis Fukuyama exemplifies this perspective with his 1992 book The End of History and the Last Man where he saw the collapse of the Soviet Union as the end-point of human history and the universalization of western liberal democracy as the final form of human government. Because the predictive value of history-as-progress has been so poor for multiple generations, alternative perspectives, such as the one laid out in this essay, should be considered and judged based on its predictive ability for future events and the clarity it brings to present and past events. (The predictive value of any theory will never be perfect; but getting as close to possible to understanding reality is a noble objective, and as Robert Browning said, “A man’s reach should exceed his grasp, or what’s a heaven for?”).
For those with rigid, fixed world-views who are faced with new circumstances that go against their world-views, unless they are willing to demonstrate flexibility, admit error and update their perspectives, even if that involves difficult modifications, it can result in mental glitch-outs or breakdowns. This has already happened to quite a few people, and as we descend further into hard living via neoliberal feudalism the phenomenon will become more common. This can be ameliorated to an extent if a person tries to be consciously aware of the biases and assumptions that inform their views (we all have such biases and assumptions) and to be flexible if situations arise that cut against their current beliefs.
Takeaway #2: People respond to labels of “good” and “bad”, and the way people develop those labels is via morality tales.
“An error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is suppressed…He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of secret complicity.” - Pope Felix III, quoted by Pope Leo XIII
This essay is a morality tale. While it describes how narratives are created, how they are disseminated, and why people believe them, at it’s core it is about a small, evil cabal that hijacks these instincts in most people in order to steal from them and murder them. It is a tale of the masses of humanity who get bamboozled against their own interests when many just want to participate in their community, earn enough money to survive and leave a little positive mark on the world. This cabal will start wars, they will lie, cheat and steal, they will do anything in the name of some nebulous “greater good” they pay lip service to that ultimately only benefits themselves, such as fake-concern about global warming or COVID or a Russia/Ukraine war or a 20 year Afghanistan war. They will do anything, say anything, with a brutal end-justifies-the-means mentality every step of the way. This is a morality tale against these people.
Takeaway #3: Central banks need to be publicly owned.
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." - Josiah Stamp, director of the Bank of England 1928-1941
The ability for a privately owned central bank to print money out of thin air and lend it at interest to the government can and will be used to steal that nation’s wealth, first slowly and then quickly; and they will use those printed funds to aggressively repeat this process in other nations. By purchasing the media, bribing politicians and establishing enforcement organizations like the FBI, DOJ, and CIA to protect the central bank owners and punish their enemies, a deadly energy is unleashed, creating a feedback loops that ultimately crushes opposition even when the public is overwhelmingly against their actions.
That being said, central banks are likely never going to be abolished. History shows that centralization always beats decentralization as a general principle no matter how much one would wish it to be otherwise. Christianity beat Hellenism, in part, because Christianity was much more centralized with its regional Bishops. Technological societies also always beat less technologically advanced societies. Central banks were an innovation and it seems unimaginable to return to an era without them. But central banks should be publicly owned, transparent and with regular audits. History shows that the wealth and well-being of citizens in publicly owned central banks vastly outstrips that of countries with privately (or crypto-privately) owned central banks. See Appendix A for details.
In an optimal world there would also be a re-introduction of a reoccurring, periodic debt jubilee, whereby all public and private debts are wiped out.
This issue impacts every country that has a Rothschild owned central bank, which is basically every country in the world. Everyone in these countries has been enslaved by this privately owned central bank scheme and therefore everyone has an incentive once they become aware of it to resist this structure in order to restore their independence. This system is so pernicious precisely because the vast majority of people are unaware of their status as slaves. Slavery in the world was never abolished, instead it broadened to a much broader population by becoming indirect; populations slaving away with physical labor to pay interest on unbacked fiat debt created out of thin air. Thus central banks need to be nationalized - and not just nationalized in name, but fully and completely, with robust transparency and regular, professional audits to ensure that nasty games like the falsely nationalized Bank of England don’t get played.
This global problem requires a global solution; all the people’s of the world are unknowing slaves and they all have an interest once they identify their real interests in resisting it. Compare the scope of this argument to a dissident ideology with a narrow focus like white nationalism. While white westerners are increasingly developing a racial self-identity as they become a hated upcoming-minority in their own countries, America is only 60% white and quite indoctrinated against racial self-awareness, and the rest of the west isn’t far behind; the white percent of the world population has declined from 25% in 1900 to only 6.5% today. Juxtapose this with pre-World War 2 Germany which was 98% white and where white nationalism was an easy Schelling point. Therefore, the central bank approach is a much better Schelling point for present conditions, and one broadly applicable to the world.
Takeaway #4: Awareness of the methods and intent of media programming is crucial toward freeing one’s mind from their propaganda.
The hope of this essay is that it serves as a deprogramming tool for a small number of people who are natural dissidents but whose brains have been fogged by propaganda; to restructure one’s worldview to focus on the importance of policies that concretely promote ones family, friends, and community. The goal is not some nebulous thing as “democracy”, the chase of which has led to nothing but death and destruction in its wake. The goal is the implementation of policies that improve the social, economic, and general well being for the majority of a country’s citizens even if it takes coming at the expense of the central bank owners, and to learn to make persuasive arguments to regular people to solicit their support for such ends that doesn’t trigger their fight/flight response.
Because people learn by repetition and not one-time exposure to truth, it takes lots of time repeating ideas before it sinks in for them. This is not a rational process and one is never going to “win someone over” with one slam-dunk airtight argument in a single sitting. You have to wear them down over time from all angles, gradually acclimating them to the alternative until they can break out of their programming. Therefore, dissidents should be encouraged to find communities online and offline who reinforce one’s natural beliefs instead of confuse them (which can be a challenge in an era of mass censorship and crackdowns).
If free speech is allowed, online communities always become right-leaning over time. This Salon article explains why any unmoderated forum always morphs into pro-law and order over time - the author tries to smear the concept as “fascist”, which is a Pavlovian trigger term.2 It is the reason why the government has worked so hard to keep dissident voices from gaining a critical mass on social media; if they allow the counter-programming to be normalized, the sheer message volume will result in capturing the minds of the masses, which is not based in logic but in repetition and consensus building.
Deprogramming from a lifetime of propaganda brainwashing is something that takes years, decades, or perhaps a lifetime to accomplish. Reading an insane news article by a clickbait pussyhat wearer and rejecting its conclusions still plants the seeds and framing of that argument within your mind - it’s much better not to read such an article at all. To consume content mindfully and carefully will decrease globohomo’s propaganda control over our minds, and will decrease the establishment’s ability to herd us into the exact reaction they want in their false action-reaction-synthesis dialectic. Your mind is their target.
Once you begin deprogramming yourself, it opens the door to questioning and re-examining every official narrative with a critical, unbiased eye no matter how low-status it seems: whether it’s the moon landing or chemtrails or the poisoning of the food supply or vaccines or the public school indoctrination complex or a million other things. Establishment narrative control was comforting because it told everyone what to believe and established consensus. But now the consensus is shattered and everyone has to make up their own minds. The hope is that a new consensus can be formed around a belief that the establishment is evil and the Rothschild central banks across the world should be disbanded.
Takeaway #5: Christianity was likely concocted as a Paul-led meta-narrative to undermine and destroy gentile Rome.
Christianity featured a number of cutting-edge, revolutionary memetic features that allowed it to outcompete paganism over time: (1) a Heaven vs. Hell motivational carrot and stick, compared to Hades where everyone went under Hellenism; (2) centralized regional Bishops vs. decentralized, disorganized priests under Hellenism (a core trend in human history is that centralization (almost?) always beats decentralization); and (3) it focused on raising the status of the poor masses, both spiritually and by providing charity (offering free food and shelter).
Despite its origins, Christianity eventually found its footing and balance with a rigid, hierarchical Catholicism that tempered the worst equality impulses of the religion. By attacking and removing the hierarchical structure beginning with Luther, the subjective, individualistic Protestants led directly to Unitarianism which in turn led to the secular Unitarian globalism that most of society believes in today, hidden under a false belief in rationalism and science.
Because core Christian doctrines encourage believers to turn the other cheek, wait for justice in the afterlife, and emphasize the equality of mankind, and with a weakening of the hierarchical Catholicism which balanced these energies, Christianity has become too patient, deferential and afterlife-focused to forcefully oppose the central bank owners or media manipulation schemes. Even though they are fundamentally allies in this struggle against globohomo, the rigid hierarchy of Catholicism has been hollowed out from the inside - consider the current globohomo Pope or ponder the College of Cardinals that elected him - and one may unfortunately expect many to waffle and drag their feet on any necessary reform.
Takeaway #6: The end goal is a balance between the extreme energies of equality and priestliness we have today and the energies of hierarchy, nobility, and warrior-hood.
The way a civilization works is that whatever core value animates it is pushed and pushed to a more and more extreme level, like a snowball rolling down a hill, until it results in a singularity where that value wipes out all others, or that civilization is either conquered or undergoes a transvaluation of values. In the case of western civilization, the core value is equality (expressed currently as the push for racial, sexual, and sexual orientation equality by leveling-down any higher functioning group down to the lowest common denominator), and it will be pushed far past the point of sanity, as is already occurring, until it either results in the leftist singularity or a transvaluation of values occurs (or the west is militarily conquered).
Having unbalanced priestly vs. warrior energies one way or the other is unhealthy both for society and for one’s soul. There should be an equilibrium between these polarities and in modern society there is no middle ground; it is pure Rothschild central bank control with slave morality and racial strife for the masses. The ideals of inequality and master morality should be appreciated for its positive values such as its emphasis on greatness, strength, directness, honesty, nobility, and for its benefits of creating stability and accountability, while balanced with a priestly degree of equality, dynamism and other-worldliness.
Whether such a balance comes from a new secular movement, a new religion (as Spandrell argues), or a reinvigoration of hierarchical Catholicism, people are only willing to fight and die for promises of reward either in this life or in the afterlife. Christianity and Islam offer eternal rewards for faith; Nazism offered high status to all Germans even as it ignored the question of what happens in the afterlife; Western Democracy promised higher quality of secular life due to “freedom” and rampant consumerism; communism offered “free goods”. Removing the Rothschild private central bank cancer from humanity’s midst would drastically increase people’s quality of life worldwide. Could it serve as a sufficient motivational Schelling point for the world to transvalue these priestly energies and regain autonomy for people worldwide?
Any major change is unlikely to come from reform of Rothschild-controlled existing institutions. Various attempts to reform the DOJ, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, Homeland Security, the university system and the media have been tried and they have all failed (such as the Church Committee). These organizations are too institutionally corrupt and insular to accept sunlight or reform, and they protect each other from any meaningful change using all sorts of underhanded, shady, corrupt practices. The FBI now officially denies Congress a right of oversight.3 As H.L. Mencken put it more than half a century ago, “[The Department of Justice] has been engaged in sharp practices since the earliest days and remains a fecund source of oppression and corruption today. It is hard to recall an administration in which it was not the center of grave scandal.”4 Professor Angelo Codvevilla, Professor of International Relations at Boston University and who served as a professional staff member of the Select Committee on Intelligence of the United States Senate, specifically argues that the CIA needs to be dissolved. One can vote for Republicans or outsiders to try to slow the establishment’s full takeover of society, but until a leader addresses the core of these issues head-on, the governmental issues plaguing society will keep rolling inexorably toward the leftist singularity.
Takeaway #7: Don’t despair even if things get much worse.
This is a hard takeaway because everything looks like the forces of evil are winning and that God is non-interventionist and doesn’t care. The reasons not to despair are that (1) the establishment really wants you to despair; the more you despair and are passive toward their agenda, thinking they are destined to win, the easier it will be for them to implement their agenda; (2) to despair is to assume you know the outcome of the future, which no one does and history is full of surprises (Spengler agrees with this5); (3) globohomo feeds off western civilization like a parasite feeds off its host, and western civilization is sick and dying; to assume a parasite can both survive and thrive after its host dies is questionable (this is the globohomo paradox: the more globohomo “wins” and levels down society to the lowest common denominator, the harder it may be for the system to continue to function because its competence level decreases); (4) globohomo is simply about materialist control over man, and we know that every ideological system of government over the past 2,000 years has failed, including Soviet communism, so western anti-white racism seems destined to fail sooner or later. As the proverb goes, “Man plans and God laughs.” In the grand cycle empires rise by promoting multiculturalism, which in turn decreases civic virtue, and which ultimately destroys the empire; hence empires always carry within them the seeds of their own end. Despair plays into the hands of your enemies and you should reject it out of hand. There is always hope.6
Furthermore, as times become more difficult as the Great Reset and neoliberal feudalism are achieved, the more people will be desperate for an answer to address it. During times of plenty people are generally happy with the status quo and unwilling to consider change (this is part of the reason why Ron Paul’s messaging failed), but people’s quality of lives and standards of living are now decreasing drastically which increases the possibility for more radical change. If the Great Reset is accomplished and if the Rothschilds and their allies take all the world’s wealth and centralize it, exposing themselves for the world to see (as they increasingly are) that may just be what is needed before their final unraveling. Material wealth and spirituality have a strong inverse correlation, and weak economic times will result in an increased search for answers in God and religion.
Takeaway #8: Stop looking to anyone else to save you on an individual level.
Based on thousands of years of history, it is a regular occurrence that group populations pay the price for actions of their leaders and forebears, and God’s laws includes a substantial amount of blood guilt; the wrongs you have caused today may not be felt until your grandchildren’s generation, no matter how much we may find such results unjust. We collectively may have to pay a big price for the deeds of our ancestors. Understand the rural vs urban divide between fertility rates and political orientation; conservatives living in rural areas have many more children than liberals living in cities and a much higher quality of life. There’s a reason that pagan means “rural” or “rustic” in Latin; it’s because the pagan rural class were the most resistant to the expansion of Christianity in Roman times. If one hopes to maintain the beliefs and traditions of Western Civilization as most of society becomes subsumed to the secular post-Christian cult of equality, being in a rural area is likely the best place you can be (well, at least until globohomo shoves as many illegal immigrants into rural areas as they can). One should count on yourself and your family and friends, not on some far-off figure like Q, Trump, Carlson or Musk to save you.
Final Takeaway: Keep believing in God and objective truth.
The existence of evil manifested in sociopathic liberals plus their seemingly embodiment of a higher creative, destructive energy must, by the law of opposites, entail that an opposing Godly, good energy exists as well. Even if a Godly energy didn’t exist, because people must always believe in something, the belief in a loving God protects them from putting their faith in dangerous ideologies that invariably result in the murder of tremendous numbers of people. Pope Leo XIII said, “To suffer and to endure…is the lot of humanity. Let men strive as they may, no strength and no artifice will ever succeed in banishing from human life the ills and troubles which beset it.”7
Or consider Ernst Jünger. Jünger would ask himself during World War 2 what one could “advise a man, especially a simple man, to do in order to extricate himself from the conformity that is constantly being produced by technology?” In contrast to Carl Schmitt, the answer Jünger, an atheist, eventually settled on was: “Only prayer.” For, “In situations that can cause the cleverest of us to fail and the bravest of us to look for avenues of escape, we occasionally see someone who quietly recognizes the right thing to do and does good. You can be sure that is a man who prays.” Ultimately only a recovery of a sense of the transcendent, he decided, could serve as an antidote to nihilistic modernity’s temptations. Without it, “our freedom of will and powers of resistance diminish; the appeal of demonic powers becomes more compelling, and its imperatives more terrible.”8
Alexander Solzhnetizyn sums up how the absence of belief in God leads to a person putting their faith in dogmas that results in death and destruction, regardless of any supposedly noble intention:
“Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened." Since then I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: ‘Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.’”
One wrestles with how mankind can adapt itself to minimize suffering in the present and in the future by abiding by God’s will, but this globohomo oligarchy full of lies and destruction is not the way to anything but endless human suffering. To move forward into the next chapter requires a greater awareness of the nature of propaganda among the general population, a reintroduction of hierarchy and a return to a serious belief in God.
***
Thank you for reading if you’ve reached this far. I hope this essay has been educational for your journey. This essay is and will remain free, and I may go back and update various points as time and circumstances permit.
Please note there are two appendixes: Appendix A provides a brief look at the history of central bank initiated wars, while Appendix B provides a caveat to the central bank owner system by discussing the rise of a self-perpetuating capitalist matrix.
It is a journey with no final destination; as Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss said, "It is not knowledge, but the act of learning, not possession but the act of getting there, which grants the greatest enjoyment. When I have clarified and exhausted a subject, then I turn away from it, in order to go into darkness again. The never-satisfied man is so strange; if he has completed a structure, then it is not in order to dwell in it peacefully, but in order to begin another. I imagine the world conqueror must feel thus, who, after one kingdom is scarcely conquered, stretches out his arms for others.”
The term “fascism” derives its name from the Italian word “fasces”, meaning the bundle of rods which ancient Roman officials carried into court to punish offenders. Thus, fascism historically means law and order, the rule of law, and the intent to punish criminals — which is what the central bank owners wish to avoid at all cost, and why they have created a Pavlovian trigger mechanism in the masses tying the term and its underlying concepts to evil.
"Oversight request must be weighed against the Department’s interests in protecting the integrity of its work.” Per this link.
Gore Vidal, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, 93.
Spengler, The Decline of the West, 140: "On the surface of history it is the unforeseen that reigns. Every individual event, decision and personality is stamped with its hall-mark. No one foreknew the storm of Islam at the coming of Mohammed, nor foresaw Napoleon in the fall of Robespierre. The coming of great men, their doings, their fortune, are all incalculables. No one knows whether a development that is setting in powerfully will accomplish its course in a straight line like that of the Roman patrician order or will go down in doom like that of the Hohenstaufen or the Maya Culture. And — science notwithstanding — it is just the same with the destinies of every single species of beast and plant within earth-history and beyond even this, with the destiny of the earth itself and all the solar systems and Milky Ways. The insignificant Augustus made an epoch, and the great Tiberius passed away ineffective. Thus, too, with the fortunes of artists, art- works and art-forms, dogmas and cults, theories and discoveries. That, in the whirl of becoming, one element merely succumbed to destiny when another became (and often enough has continued and will continue to be) a destiny itself - that one vanishes with the wave-train of the surface while the other makes this, is something that is not to be explained by any why-and-wherefore and yet is of inward necessity.”
On the flip side, try not to become an accelerationist, which (according to one meaning) is to hope things fall apart faster so more people will wake up, like the frog in a cooking pot. Most of the accelerationists use magical thinking, assuming that 1. acceleration will somehow lead to collapse or overthrow of globohomo; 2. they personally will emerge out of such acceleration with their preferred political model and with much higher social status; and 3. even if they get desired collapse, that they wouldn't starve to death or become a victim of a cannibal rape gang. It is a naive perspective.
Peikoff, 148.
But note that Jünger himself received criticism, although his concept of an anarch who maintains independent thought regardless of external circumstances is a powerful one. According to Julius Evola, “Jünger…should be numbered among those individuals who first subscribed to 'Conservative Revolutionary' ideas but were later, in a way, traumatized by the National Socialist experience, to the point of being led to embrace the kind of sluggishly liberal and humanistic ideas which conformed to the dominant attempt 'to democratically reform' their country; individuals who have proven incapable of distinguishing the positive side of past ideas from the negative, and of remaining true to the former. Alas, this incapability to discern is, in a way, typical of contemporary Germany (the land of the 'economic miracle')."
Thanks for making public this sincere thinking and writing effort, JR. I, too, once thought 'ideological dissidents' were few and far between, but then read Alex de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" and recognized from what he had to observe and write that this nation was extremely heavily leavened by such people from its very start -- and still is, generation after generation. They are exactly the sort of people who do not go about looking for, or are reliant on, the instruction and encouragement of others. As to thinking that abolishing problematic central banks will solve many of the problems afflicting humanity, I remember reading Confucius's remark to the effect of: 'If you try to rid the world of thievery by instituting a system of weights and measures, then the people will quickly learn to steal through the use of weights and measures.' Rust never sleeps -- and the 'rusting' tendency is not something confined to any one particular ethnic or cultural group.
Although I still think you are deeply wrong on Christianity, you are fucking dead right on Central Banking. Prosit, my friend.