Goals, Motivations and Strategies of the Owners of Modern Society: Part 2
Coordination and leak prevention techniques
Continued from Part 1…
This part asks: If this is some sort of grand conspiracy why don’t more people know about it? How do the central bank owners keep the public from discovering their strategies? How do they coordinate, and how do they prevent leaks?
HOW DO THE CENTRAL BANK OWNERS KEEP THE PUBLIC FROM DISCOVERING THEIR STRATEGIES?
As a preamble, one of the core central bank owner policies is their deliberations and decisions must not be covered by the mainstream media or scholarly publications in order to minimize public exposure. Scholarship from dissidents is comparatively poorly sourced versus establishment publications because the funding and status incentives for research, publication, and publicity are provided to establishment employees and deliberately starved from dissidents. As the central bank owner’s primary goal is the centralization of wealth and power through neoliberal feudalistic debt practices, the following discussion regarding their tactics and strategies are based on
the words and actions of their step-down intermediaries in the public eye such as the World Economic Forum, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and Trilateral Commission which are used to coordinate policy decisions from the top;
public comments from current and former intermediaries who had access to the perspectives of those close to the power center;
analysis of the incentive structures for these elites; and
inferences drawn from the information provided in this essay, especially the close coordination between the world central banks, the media, and top industry figures to push the same agenda.
So how do the Rothschilds and their allies, including the Warburgs, Rockefellers and Schiffs1 keep the public from discovering their strategies? If enough people figure it out, they could have masses of people with pitchforks at their gates.
Early on they purchased as much of the media as they could. For instance, Paul Julius Reuters (i.e. the founder of Reuters news agency) was working directly with the Rothschilds as early as 1850. George Wheeler tells us: "Around [the early 1900s] the Morgan firm was choosing the top executives for the old and troubled Harper & Brothers publishing house.... In the newspaper field, Pierpont Morgan [who worked for the Rothschilds; discussed below] at this period was in effective control of the New York Sun,... the Boston News Bureau, Barron's magazine, and the Wall Street Journal.”2 On February 9, 1917, Representative Callaway from Texas took the floor of Congress and provided further insight. He said:
“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press.... They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.... An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”
Charles S. Mellen of the New Haven Railroad testified before Congress that his Morgan-owned railroad had over one-thousand New England newspaper editors on the payroll, costing about $400,000 annually. The railroad also held almost a half-million dollars in bonds issued by the Boston Herald. This web of control was multiplied by hundreds of additional companies which also were controlled by Morgan and other investment-banking houses.
Morgan’s control over the media at that time is well documented, but he was by no means alone in this. During the 1912 hearings held by the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee it was revealed that Representative Joseph Sibley was acting as a funnel for Rockefeller money to various cooperative congressmen. A letter was introduced to the Committee written by Sibley in 1905 to John D. Archbold, the man at Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company who provided the funds. In that letter Sibley said: "An efficient literary bureau is needed, not for a day or a crisis but a permanent healthy control of the Associated Press and kindred avenues. It will cost money but will be the cheapest in the end." The Rockefeller’s leveraged their vast volume of petroleum and allied advertising to insure the fealty of a newspaper, and when advertising alone was not sufficient to insure loyalty the Rockefeller companies made direct payments in return for a friendly editorial attitude.
Today vast industry consolidation has made control easier to achieve than ever before. Per the Swiss Policy Research analysis, most western media coverage is provided by one of only three news agencies: the Associated Press, Reuters and Agence France-Presse. Six companies control 90% of U.S. media due to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the top shareholders of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney, News Corp are Vanguard, Blackrock and Statestreet, all establishment entities. This way the media will never report on central bank owner activities except as a fringe, low status conspiracy theory.
David Rockefeller states in his memoirs:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”
After taking control over media, these central bank owners bribed and installed unthinking marionettes as government officials who were willing to push their policies without question. One can see this with multiple politicians like Justin Trudeau, Boris Johnson, Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron, Sanna Marin, Prince Charles, etc, who are all dull and unthinking puppets.
The heads of the central banks of the world are also marionettes (despite nice perks like being able to sell their personal stock holdings right at the peak of the market). Per Professor Quigley,
“It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers to their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantial financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called ‘international’ or ‘merchants’ bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks…”3
Jerome Powell is nothing but an actor serving as a figurehead for real power.
The central bank owners also bribed educational institutions to focus on racial conflict and ignore class conflict. In 2018, higher education institutions received a total of $149 billion from the federal government, representing 3.6% of federal spending. This money flowed into colleges and universities through three main vehicles: federal student aid, grants, and contracts, and these come with significant strings attached for all but the handful of schools that reject the aid.
As the plundering of a nation’s wealth gets worse and more obvious, the central bank owners focused their media organs, who were already focused on bread and circus narratives and entertainment/celebrity stories, on wars and racial grievances to distract from class grievances: classic divide et impera. If whites and the blacks hate each other, gays and straights hate each other, and women and men hate each other, all the better because it will drain their precious energies from focusing on the ultimate cause of all of their grief and misery.
They also focused on weakening the population as much as possible so they can never rebel even if people figure out what is going on. Poison the water and food supplies to make the masses fat and low testosterone and give them plenty of Netflix and porn.4 Encourage abortion, casual sex and contraceptive use. Decrease the role of religion. Do everything to break up nuclear families so people are too emotionally shattered to figure anything out. Aaron Russo, producer of the film Trading Places and friends with a prominent Rockefeller, said the Rockefeller bragged about this strategy:
Single women make excellent foot soldiers for the establishment, repeating whatever propaganda is distributed by the media organs. Flood each troublesome country (i.e. the white countries which are too independently minded) with non-whites who will vote for policies and politicians the central bank owners want (as blacks vote 90% for larger government/debt and Hispanics vote 58%+ that way as well) so long as the media keeps up the racial grievance angle and the immigrants are thrown some public welfare funds. Isn’t it odd that the same strategies that central bank thieves would theoretically optimally use to demoralize, weaken and distract a host population from their theft is what the world has been experiencing for decades?
Essentially, the central bank owner strategy has been to turn the country into an atomized, impoverished, multi-ethnic, low IQ, highly estrogenated, obese and porn’d out mess, constantly arguing about race, gender, and sexual orientation instead of class. Their strategy has so far worked wonderfully.
HOW IS COORDINATION ACHIEVED?
How do the central bank owners coordinate all of their lackeys worldwide — the media orgs, the bribed and extorted politicians, the corrupt business leaders, the military officials, the NGOs, the major foundations and the underling everyday bankers pushing their policies?
Coordination based on formal meetings: The Bildberberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission5, the Round Table, and the World Economic Forum are used to promulgate and coordinate policies promoting the central bank owner goals. These groups hold both regular and special meetings as well as war-game various future meta-narrative contingencies with cutting edge AI-technology as an assist. They come up with new public-facing front groups every generation when the public becomes too aware of the previous one’s functions or, alternatively, in order to let the leaders of the next generation make their own imprints. The World Economic Forum is the one currently in the spotlight, but at some point it will exeunt stage left and the next one will enter the picture.
To be clear, none of these organizations have power in and of themselves; they are merely representatives of and coordination for the policies ordered by the powers at the level above them. Eustace Mullins states that, taking the CFR as an example,
“The members of the Council on Foreign Relations have never originated a single item of policy for the U.S. Government. They merely transmit orders to our government officials from the RIIA (the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the parent organization of the CFR) and the House of Rothschild in London. It is true that the CFR comprises a ruling elite in the United States, but they are mere colonial governors absolutely responsible to their overseers in the World Order…Not only do they transmit orders to the White House, the Cabinet, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and other government institutions, but they also maintain absolute control of the foundations, whose duty it is to formulate policy or organize it in acceptable form to be transmitted to the government. Shoup’s Imperial Brain Trust, 1969, notes that the CFR includes 22 trustees of Brookings Institution, 29 at Rand, 14 at Hudson, 33 at Middle East Institute, 14 of 19 trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation, 10 of 17 at Carnegie, 7 of 16 at Ford Foundations, 6 of 11 at Rockefeller Bros. Fund. This proves that the CFR runs these major foundations. In the academic world, CFR members number 58 on the faculty at Princeton, 69 at the University of Chicago, and 30 at Harvard. Of the banks which are principal owners of Federal Reserve Bank stock, directors of Chase include 7 CFR members, 8 at J.P. Morgan, 7 at 1st Natl. City (now Citibank), 6 at Chemical Bank, and 6 at Brown Bros. Harriman.”6
Coordination based on shared education and upbringing: The central bank owners use useful idiots wherever possible, i.e. those who graduated from elite universities who have accepted the racial and sex grievance, global warming, gender fluidity and other approved dogmas, and place them in media and un-fireable civil service jobs. These people will naturally coordinate based on a shared upbringing and outlook shaped from education, propaganda consumption and career incentives. The more these types can be used to advance the overarching agenda without knowing what the longer-term goals are, the better; their worldview is limited enough that they get caught up in each meta-narrative being pushed, unknowing pawns in a greater game. For example, the journalists involved in JournoList, CabalList, and whatever current incarnation it now is know that they are manipulative narrative disseminators meant to follow the establishment party line, but except for a few at the top most are satisfied with virtue signaling and don’t understand the bigger picture.
Coordination based on tax exempt foundations: The central bank owners control the United States through tax exempt foundations which create and implement government policy through staff members in key positions in the executive, legislative and judiciary branches; they create educational policy through their staff members in key positions in the educational system; and religious policy through their staff members in key positions in leading religious denominations. Foundation is really in inapt term; they are criminal syndicates masquerading as philanthropic enterprises while they push world slavery on nations and people. In an attempt to investigate tax exempt foundations, Norman Dodd, Director of Research for the Reece Committee, was asked by Congressman B. Carroll Reece in January 1954:
“Do you accept the premise that the United States is the victim of a conspiracy?” “Yes,” said Dodd. “Then,” said Congressman Reece, “you must conduct the investigation on that basis.” B.E. Hutchinson, chairman of Chrysler Corp., although approving the goals of the investigation, warned Dodd, “If you proceed as you have outlined, you will be killed.”
Dodd stated, “The foundation world is a coordinated, well-directed system, the purpose of which is to ensure that the wealth of our country shall be used to divorce it from the ideas which brought it into being. The foundations are the biggest single influence in collectivism.”7
The foundations all use language counter to their actual goals in their public facing statements and charters. They use such phrases as “the wellbeing of mankind” “the elimination of poverty”, the “elimination of disease”, “the promotion of world brotherhood”. Compassion, caring, charity, these are the buzzwords of the foundations. But their true intentions are to promote the enslavement of mankind at the orders of the central bank owners.
According to Mullins,
“Examining the dominant members of the Rockefeller Foundation, we find men whose lives have been devoted to war and revolution, chemical warfare, international intrigue, and mass murder; we find the chairman of the board was John Foster Dulles, who inherited the title of “most dangerous man in America” from his mentor, William Nelson Cromwell; Dulles obtained crucial financing for Hitler, and sent the key telegram involving the U.S. in the Korean War, while his brother, a director of Schroder Bank, set up the CIA; we find Karl T. Compton, who gave the word to drop the atomic bomb on Japan in 1945 and unleashed the horror of atomic warfare on the entire world (he was also trustee of Ford Foundation); we find Lord Franks, key member of the Rhodes Trust, the Schroder Bank; what we do not find is anyone who has ever engaged in any charitable endeavour. The Rockefeller directors of what is properly the “Rockefeller Syndicate” interlock with the nation’s major banks, corporations, universities and government departments. This is the network which illegally rules America, which, by its tax evasion, places a tremendous tax burden on all American taxpayers, and which makes our elections a farce because these men determine all policies which are implemented in the United States…through the Sealantic Fund, the Rockefeller’s control American schools of theology and the religious institutions of America; through the Rockefeller Brothers Fund they control government policy.…The list of trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation shows it continues to be the ruling hierarchy of the U.S.”8
Norman Dodd stated that while investigating tax exempt foundations, he interviewed H. Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation. Gaither explained to Dodd, “Most of us here were, at one time or another, active in either the OSS or the State Dept., or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we operated under directives issued by the White House, the substance of which was to the effect that we should make every effort to alter life in the U.S. as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.” The Ford Foundation spends vast amounts of money to promote racial agitation and possibly civil war in America, completely polarizing the races, and has backed many revolutionary groups in the U.S. engaged in riots and other criminal offenses.9
Think tanks such as Rand are funded by the foundations for military and espionage work. Morgan and Rockefeller directors are heavily represented on the board of The Brookings Institution, whose budget is funded by the major foundations - Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Milbank Memorial Fund. The Brookings Institution, among its other tasks, originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy American farmers (which is ongoing10), who are especially vulnerable to Fed policies because of their need for significant capital for their operations. Just as in the Soviet Union in the early 1930s when Stalin ordered the kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural Soviets or trusts.11
The Tavistock Institute, heavily funded by the foundations to the tune of billions per year, developed the mass brain-washing techniques which have been widely used on the American public by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personnel are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations, along with the personnel of the foundations. Tavistock originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill12 against Germany as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the “guinea pigs” reacting under “controlled laboratory conditions.” They were also responsible for the experiment in compulsory racial integration, the use of drug experiments (see MK Ultra), and placing German foster children with pedophiles. The goal of their research is to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose Rothschild central bank owners. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior is used by Tavistock as weapons of crowd control. Ten major institutions are under Tavistock’s direct control with 400 subsidiaries and 3,000 other groups and think tanks which originate many types of programs to increase establishment control.13
Tavistock also conducted a longterm study on gender transitioning teenagers with extensive brainwashing beginning in 2011, years before transsexualism was unleashed onto the public.
According to an article by William H. What in Fortune magazine in November 1955, the foundations only grant funds to “big team” projects in institutions which are under their control. Whyte says 76% of all foundation grants are made to these “team” projects”, citing huge sums given to the Russian Research Center at Harvard by Carnegie, and Ford grants to the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences at Stanford. Foundation grants are rarely given to individuals and most can be traced to some underlying propaganda drive.14
HOW ARE LEAKS PREVENTED?
How do the central bank owners prevent traitors in their midst? While the core of the conspiracy is the Rothschilds and a small, mostly Jewish ruling aristocracy of England and Europe, most of whom have owned stock in the Bank of England since 1700, along with a couple others such as the Rockefellers, based on circumstantial evidence there are various levels or rings of access and knowledge: the inner sanctum where much of the overarching long-term goals and strategies are revealed; the middle sanctum, where an individual can have a say on strategy but must obey orders; and the outer sanctum, loyalists without knowledge of the overarching plan but who serve as loyal foot soldiers and receive preferment in society.
The core only let those people into the inner sanctum and reveal this grand strategy to those who are wholly dependent on its favors; in other words, if they swear allegiance to their anti-humanistic goals and the central bank owners have enormous leverage on them. That way an inner sanctum member can never leave and if they try they would be destroyed or murdered. “The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in it’s profits or so dependent on it’s favors, that there will be no opposition from that class,” said Treasury Secretary John Sherman. There have been swirling rumors that to reach the inner sanctum one must be a pedophile and let others in the group have evidence of one’s misdeeds as blackmail (see the Marc Dutroux case as an example); this isn’t farfetched as it is exactly what Jeffrey Epstein was caught doing - note his safe was cleared out by the FBI post-arrest, it “went missing” and the issue dropped. And Epstein was intimately connected to the Rothschilds.15 Additionally their lackeys in the security agencies are infested with pedophiles which is also public knowledge. Not every family member of the core families are involved in the overarching plans - they have quite large extended families at this point and occasionally one of their own even falls for the propaganda fed to the masses.
An example of an inner sanctum member — but not a core central bank owner — was J.P. Morgan. Morgan became known as the most powerful banker in the world although his principal role was to secretly carry out commissions for the House of Rothschild. He carried out his assignments covertly, cultivating a sleigh-of-hand reputation as anti-semitic to keep public distance from his masters. Morgan was a direct descendant of Alexander Hamilton, who had chartered America’s first central bank at the behest of Rothschild interests. The Morgan-Rothschild connection explains the otherwise incomprehensible mystery of why Morgan left such a modest fortune at his death in 1913, a mere $11 million after his debts were paid. Although the present members of the Morgan family seem financially secure, none of them is counted among the “big rich.”16 George Soros is another well known inner sanctum member as is Bill Gates.
Only let those into the middle sanctum (i.e. those who have a say on mid-term strategy but are not let in on long-term goals) those who are willing to tow the party line publicly without exception. An illuminating Larry Summers and Elizabeth Warren anecdote illustrates the role of the middle sanctum, per Warren’s autobiography, “involv[ing] a dinner that Ms. Warren had with Lawrence H. Summers, then the director of the National Economic Council and a top economic adviser to President Obama. The dinner took place in the spring of 2009, after the oversight panel had produced its third report, concluding that American taxpayers were at far greater risk to losses in TARP than the Treasury had let on. After dinner, “Larry leaned back in his chair and offered me some advice,” Ms. Warren writes. “I had a choice. I could be an insider or I could be an outsider. Outsiders can say whatever they want. But people on the inside don’t listen to them. Insiders, however, get lots of access and a chance to push their ideas. People — powerful people — listen to what they have to say. But insiders also understand one unbreakable rule: They don’t criticize other insiders. I had been warned,” Ms. Warren concluded. Warren shut her mouth and followed orders after that.
Another example of a middle sanctum member is well-known Soviet double agent Henry Kissinger. Russian Ambassador Dobrynin casually referred to Kissinger, saying “I am the laughing third man, sitting still. Kissinger is negotiating for us too”, and later Brezhnev, dictator of Russia, stated he didn’t take a role in Middle East negotiations because “We don’t need representation. Kissinger is our man in the Middle East”.
For the outer sanctum, i.e. loyal foot soldiers who carry out the plans and receive preferment but are not let in on mid- or long-term plans of their masters, the central bank owners try to limit access to relevant media, government and industry jobs to racial allies, especially left-wing Jews who won’t pose an ideological danger to the overall plan17 or otherwise minorities with racial, sexual or sexual orientation grievances. These people receive limited notifications and instructions from higher up before the public is informed but they have no voice in matters; globohomo enforces rigid task compartmentalization18 to minimize the number of people who understand what is occurring within an organization to prevent damaging leaks like Edward Snowden or Seth Rich.
How do the central bank owners silence any domestic enemies? First, they establish a rigid Overton window, enforced by controlled media and corporate HR departments, over which speech is allowed and which is career and reputation ban-worthy (ban-worthy speech is any speech that threatens the goals or legitimacy of the establishment and is referred to as being “political incorrect”). They discourage and ruin any governmental whistleblowers and make examples of other wrong-thinkers while over time shrinking the allowed discourse as the agenda advances. The discourse allowed in America today is far more narrow and rigid than a generation ago. They also brainwash the youth via education and media propaganda so the next generation has no idea how to think about things clearly. As Orwell argued in 1984, limiting discourse has a significant effect on limiting wrong-think in general.
Once satisfied that external enemies to their objectives have been destroyed (such as Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, both of whom had publicly owned central banks; see Appendix A for details) and internal enemies have been sufficiently silenced, the central bank owners took the next step toward their goals of wealth consolidation: they ordered the U.S. off the gold standard, enabling printing of fiat currency at an exponentially increasing rate thereby spiking inflation, widening the wealth gap, enabling corporate consolidation into megacorps (including too-big-to-fail megabanks) and decreasing the wealth of the masses.
While the Rothschilds had already been manipulating the price of gold while on the gold standard, where they publicly fixed on a daily basis19, this new approach would generate astronomically greater profits.
Is it any wonder why the disconnect between the general population’s productivity and compensation started growing in 1971, the year of the end of Bretton Woods Agreement which had limited monetary printing to physical gold holdings? The end of Bretton Woods allowed the central bank owners to start printing infinite fiat currency, handing much of it to themselves and their allies and greatly increase the inequality in America:
For a whole series of data showing the shocking decline in American quality of life starting in 1971, see: https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
According to a RAND study, the aggregate income for the population below the 90th percentile between 1975-2018 would have been $2.5 trillion (67%) higher in 2018 had income growth since 1975 remained as equitable as it was in the first two post-war decades. From 1975-2018, the difference between the aggregate taxable income for those below the 90th percentile and the equitable growth counterfactual totals $47 trillion.
Following this staggering theft, the central bank owners continued their strategy of undermining and destroying any countries worldwide that had their own independent central banks or that tried to go back to the gold standard. Qaddafi in Libya and Saddam in Iraq are two recent examples. Libya had the only central bank in the world run on genuine state banking lines which exhibited the classic symptoms of full employment, zero inflation and excellent worker’s rights, and in 2010 Qaddafi announced the creation of the gold dinar as a replacement for the settlement of all foreign transactions in a proposed region of over 200 million people; this is why he was murdered. In November 2000 Saddam Hussein decreed that all oil payments would be made in euros as he did not wish to deal “in the currency of the enemy”, which is also what cost him his life. See Appendix A for further details.
To recap, the central bank owners bribed, threatened or coerced any individual or nation that could potentially weaken their position with respect to worldwide control and domination, and they smeared or destroyed any that resisted. They stole the wealth of the masses via endless monetary printing, inflation and taxes while confusing, weakening and dispiriting them under a massive propaganda deluge of bread-and-circus distractions, poor education designed to turn students into unthinking automatons and race baiting agitation, along with physically weakening them with various chemicals and poisons in their food, water and air, until they became too weak to resist additional destructive measures.
See photos from the 1972 Rothschild Illuminati Ball here.
*****
What is the goal for this four hundred year banking dynasty? They have seemingly all the power and money in the world, but it’s not enough. They want more, they want everything. How do they get everything? This is where we turn to next in Part 3.
"Seven men in Wall Street now control a great share of the fundamental industry and resources of the United States. Three of the seven men, J.P. Morgan, James J. Hill, and George F. Baker, head of the First National Bank of New York belong to the so-called Morgan group; four of them, John D. and William Rockefeller, James Stillman, head of the National City Bank, and Jacob H. Schiff of the private banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb Company, to the so-called Standard Oil City Bank group... the central machine of capital extends its control over the United States... The process is not only economically logical; it is now practically automatic.” John Moody, The Seven Men, McClure's Magazine, August, 1911, p. 418., from here.
John Swinton, editor of the New York Sun, had this to say about the profession of journalism in 1883: "There is no such a thing in America as an independent press, unless it is out in country towns. You are all slaves. You know it, and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to express an honest opinion. If you expressed it, you would know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid $150 for keeping honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for doing similar things. If I should allow honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my paper, I would be like Othello before twenty-four hours: my occupation would be gone. The man who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street hunting for another job. The business of a New York journalist is to distort the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to villify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread, or for what is about the same — his salary. You know this, and I know it; and what foolery to be toasting an "Independent Press"! We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping-jacks. They pull the string and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p. 326-7.
Streaming video porn is incredibly expensive to provide; why else would it be offered free of charge, in most cases without any ads at all?
A David Rockefeller invention. Senator Barry Goldwater termed the Commission "David Rockefeller's newest international cabal" and said, "It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States." Perloff, 155.
Mullins, 71-72.
Mullins, 212-213.
Mullins, 232.
Mullins, 280-281.
Per Gore Vidal in Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, p. 61: “But Dyer has unearthed a genuine ongoing conspiracy that affects everyone in the United States. Currently, a handful of agro-conglomerates are working to drive America's remaining small farmers off their land by systematically paying them less for their produce than it costs to grow, thus forcing them to get loans from the conglomerates' banks, assume mortgages, and undergo foreclosures and the sale of land to corporate-controlled agribusiness. But is this really a conspiracy or just the Darwinian workings of an efficient marketplace? There is, for once, a smoking gun in the form of a blueprint describing how best to rid the nation of small farmers. Dyer writes: "In 1962, the Committee for Economic Development comprised approximately seventy-five of the nation's most powerful corporate executives. They represented not only the food industry but also oil and gas, insurance, investment and retail industries. Almost all groups that stood to gain from consolidation were represented on that committee. Their report [An Adaptive Program for Agriculture] outlined a plan to eliminate farmers and farms. It was detailed and well thought out." Simultaneously, "as early as 1964, congressmen were being told by industry giants like Pillsbury, Swift, General Foods, and Campbell Soup that the biggest problem in agriculture was too many farmers."....So a conspiracy has been set in motion to replace the Jeffersonian ideal of a nation whose backbone was the independent farm family with a series of agribusiness monopolies where, Dyer writes,"these companies controlled 96% of U.S. wheat exports, 95% of U.S. corn exports," and so on through the busy aisles of [grocery stores]. Has consolidation been good for the customers? By and large, no."
Mullins, 290-291.
Churchill was utterly corrupt and had to be regularly bailed out by his benefactors, including a massive 1 million pound bailout in 1940.
Mullins, 285-288.
Mullins, 249.
“Mrs. de Rothschild was named chairwoman of the bank in January 2015. That October, she and Epstein negotiated a $25 million contract for Epstein’s Southern Trust Co. to provide “risk analysis and the application and use of certain algorithms” for the bank, according to a proposal reviewed by the Journal. In 2019, after Epstein was arrested, the bank said that Mrs. de Rothschild never met with Epstein and it had no business links with him. The bank acknowledged to the Journal that its earlier statement wasn’t accurate.” Also see this Substack post “What does a Rothschild, a Goldman Sachs top lawyer and a CIA agent have in common?”
Mullins, 34-36.
According to the Hudson Institute, compared to other ethnic groups this is highly irregular: “All the other ethno-religious groups that, like the Jews, formed part of the coalition forged by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1930s have followed the rule that increasing prosperity generally leads to an increasing identification with the Republican party. But not the Jews. As the late Jewish scholar Milton Himmelfarb said in the 1950s: ‘Jews earn like like Episcopalians (then the most prosperous minority group in America) and vote like Puerto Ricans (who were then the poorest).’ Jews also remain far more heavily committed to the liberal agenda than any of their old ethno-religious New Deal partners. As the eminent sociologist Nathan Glazer has argued, ‘whatever the promptings of their economic interests,’ Jews have consistently supported ‘increased government spending, expanded benefits to the poor and lower classes, greater regulations on business, and the power of organized labor.’…on abortion, gay rights, school prayer, gun control and assisted suicide, the survey data shows that Jews are by far the most liberal of any group in America.”
Per Sundance: "It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrating to discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.”
Per the News Chronicle of December 12, 1938, which reads “The story of the gold-fixing has often been told. How every weekday at 11 a.m. the representatives of five firms of bullion brokers and one firm of refiners meet at the office of Messrs. Rothschild (except on Saturday) and there fix the sterling price of gold….A price of gold is first suggested, probably by the representative of Messrs. Rothschild, who also acts for the Bank of England and the Exchange Equalization Account.” From Mullins, 30.
Great work 👏 at some point it seems they seem to have believed their own BS, as what's the point in controlling armies that can't fight, universities that can't think and a financial system that doesn't work? I agree that some sort of controlled demolition is taking place, but think they've vastly underestimated the complexity of the transition. Or perhaps chaos is the goal ? As long as you control all sides and the herd is culled? Any thoughts on they control internal dissent, or inter clan rivalry amongst themselves?
The lack of engagement on this post is a crime against humanity.