Imagine being anywhere close to one-tenth as cynical as the sociopaths and, arguably, psychopaths involved with this stuff.
How many doses of the mRNA "vaccine" do you suppose Klaus Schwab, Biden and other world leaders, Rochelle Walensky, and Albert Bourla got? Actually I should omit Biden--they want him dead anyway so why not, and Walensky might be dumb enough by this point to believe whatever randomness erupts from her face at any time.
"To most people, the concept of central bank ownership and their singular focus on maximizing usury and control is both boring and confusing to their minds."
Don't they most plenty deserve all we have got, are getting, and are going to get, then? 🎈
One may think of their innate, radical truth aversion and avoidance.
Even better: their innate aversion for the" weak", disarmed, innocent, and admiration for the "winners", first among all those who are best at telling them crafty lies and untruths.
There is also what a commenter wrote at Unz's: If money is your God, then who controls most of it is going to be your lord(s).
Yes, most people deserve to get what this system gives them good and hard. I don't really have much sympathy for them. The tragedy (as I see it) is that the few independent, free-thinking dissidents are subject to this system because they don't have the numbers or power to avoid its consequences. That and children suffer who havn't had a chance to choose their own path because the system destroys them...
JR -- reading the book I referenced in my comment may change your mind on the matter of genetic control of IQ. It did mine. As I've mentioned, genetic variation among humans is quite minimal. As to the intent of the 'elite' -- I don't think your evidence on that account is very firm. Maybe Klaus et al., will some day go on FOX and disclose their deepest thoughts, but my impression is that they are also under much stress and have suffered quite a major loss of IQ themselves.
"Of the remaining population, the elites will prefer to race mix them in order to lower average IQs down to 80-85 so they will be unable to challenge the elite’s power ever again, giving them permanent perpetual control." This isn't the way it works, though: it is not genetics but stress and epigenetics. For example, most of the early Russian Jewish immigrants to the US had low IQs in this range, but this phenotype disappeared quite rapidly due to the corrective influence of US economic conditions. Stress temporarily makes ANY person dumb. See Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Shafir, Eldar, 2013, Scarcity – The New Science of Having Less and How It Defines Our Lives: Henry Holt and Company, New York, 288 pages, for explanation of the mechanisms involved (summarized in https://larryturner.substack.com/p/the-vicious-cycle-of-scarcity-heres) - and https://developmentalsystem.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/1917-goddard.pdf (Mental tests and the immigrant, 1917) for Jewish Russian immigrant IQ test results. We are all (potentially, at least) Bozos on this planet.
Hi Larry, if I am understanding your point correctly, and please correct me if I am not, while I agree that environment (including nutrition, stress, war, etc) has a significant role in impacting IQ, and that improving the quality of environment has a significant effect on raising average group IQ, the scientific evidence is overwhelming that a significant part of intelligence is genetic.
To be clear, I am not an IQ supremacist; I believe that there are many different types of intelligence, and as I have quoted elsewhere from Maurice Samuel, "A simpleton may bring you salvation and a great philosopher may confound you." But I have provided evidence that our globohomo elite believe that by lowering average IQs it will provide them protection against usurpation of their rule.
The elephant in the room may be consciousness, viz. the stage of conscious awareness or evolved consciousness of a particular individual. The linked piece below references stages of consciousness using definitions articulated by Spiral Dynamics. The author’s thesis asserts consciousness is significantly correlated with intelligence. As a big fan of Spiral Dynamics, I agree.
Also, your link contains within it a well-worn Chomsky point, where he argues that regardless of any scientific proof of group IQ differences it is immoral and forbidden to even consider them. This is an essentially religious, dogmatic view (although Chomsky delusionally believes he is arguing from reason) that equality of outcome on a group basis must be enforced. brodoland's response is "it's not racist to follow the science so long as we allow equality of opportunity and not equality of outcome". Their views are not reconcilable....
1. The alleged rise of crypto and social credit score would only be bad because the government of the Washington empire is Christian and anti-White. There is nothing inherently wrong with such increased state control. Hitler would have used it to create beauty for sure.
2. Agenda 2030 is pure nonsense. Boomer scare. If it's real - why don't you support it? Any honest person would like to see either feet pics banned, or population decreased. Again, unless you're a boomer.
3. Reducing world population would be an absolute dream.
4. If the élites race-mix, then they will order their own death penalty. And the world will be conquered by those that keep their blood pure - my faith is in Juche Korea, of course.
> but a responsible leadership would never have allowed the world population to get as large as it has
All I see is a Christian world-order. Who owns the money is irrelevant if they all obey Jesus' commands. Ultimately, I would only support our gay overlord Klaus Schwab if he had decreased the population of India and Turkey, and gassed the Japanese. If he doesn't - he will be overthrown by the said Turks and Chinese.
I fail to see the end of the world, the advent of a technocratic feudal utopia, a one-world government. The Türks may now bow before the Americans, but they use it to commit a merry genocide against the Armenians - laughing their asses off while calling it a "climate action".
Your Georgia-Guidestones-esque chimaera is reminiscent of that Russian Armenian cultist Kurginyan's seeing Nazis in Latvia.
Hi Adunai, please correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem more comfortable with totaltarianism than I am.
It's not that I don't think huge, ultra-powerful governments dictating every aspect of our lives won't inevitably happen due to the "progress" of technology, nor do I necessarily think that changing our current leadership without a competing ideology using similar tactics is possible.
But as a guy who values individualism and being anti-groupthink, I see it as a catch-22: To defeat liberals in the game of politics one needs to adopt extensive propaganda tactics to control the NPC mind, which means generally de-emphasizing individualism and free thought/expression, which to me doesn’t seem morally correct. I quoted Hitler in one of my earlier posts where he bragged about getting Germans to about-face 180 degrees on issues at a moment’s notice based on the power of the media…I empathize with a free thinker like Junger who abstained from group action. I don’t know if there’s an answer to this conundrum. The incentive structure for the world is all wrong.
Re: the Christian world-order, I think you will find my post tomorrow delving into the origins of Christianity to be interesting.
Adunai:* We already live in a society, a culture that imprisons our thoughts and dictates our behaviours. Conversely, living alone won't achieve anything for anyone. So I fail to see the problematic.
It is impossible to "defeat the liberals" when their power structure remains intact. To destroy it, a nuclear war or an economical crysis is needed. Still, I fail to see any inkling of an anti-liberal message in the West. Maybe Andrew Tate? He's an anarchist, but slightly wilder.
Either way, I'd prefer to watch it crash and burn under the weight of its own idiocy.
P.S. Groupthink? Every thought is part of a particular "groupthink". The free-thinking people may merely choose a particular gramophone record to play, or mix them up. Why the constant penchant for "muh' freedom"? Sure, normies have always been cattle, but it's not like we "aristocrats" know the perfect answer to every question on earth.
Hi Adunai (name corrected above), it depends on what problem you are trying to solve for. If you are trying to solve for the achievement of political power, control over group action is imperative. But that is not my goal here; I am trying to see, once all the narrative lies are stripped away (which is a very difficult task), what is left, and what does it say about the nature of reality and the nature of God? My task is essentially religious in nature, even though it is arrived at via a strict observation of material reality.
Re: " I'd prefer to watch it crash and burn under the weight of its own idiocy", just keep in mind that all easily accessible energy sources have been mined and depleted; all the oil, gas, coal, rare minerals, etc we are extracting now require a tremendous amount of technological knowledge based on our level of civilizational achievements. It seems likely that if total collapse happens, civilization may never be able to restart again. Additionally, the problem with "accelerationists" is that they by-and-large are possessed by magical thinking; they think that (1) whatever emerges from the collapse scenario will favor their own subjective political utopia model and that (2) they themselves will emerge with much higher social status. In reality, in a true collapse scenario 99% of people will either starve to death or be victim of cannibal rape gangs.
On the first point, my view is essentially idealistic, I view history as a struggle as much racial materialistic as it is between the "gods". Cultural alchemy is the greatest mystery - what made Germany accept the teachings of Nietzsche and Haeckel, but England reject them? Or why industrialisation was realised in Japan but not in Korea/China?
Regarding the second point, it might be of ignorance, but I refuse to contemplate a global collapse. In the case of Russia, we already had one in the 1990s, and now another one. In the West proper, the transition might even be seamless to Brazil 2.0 which would seem like a collapse with hindsight, but not with a specific breaking point. And whatever husk remains, will get subsumed in a renovated culture such as the Eurabian Caliphate, and a return of Quetzalcoatl in America.
Ah, indeed, I tend to discard anything Aryan west of the Elbe as by and large lost for "our" cause. The last redoubt is set to be Pripetfestung.
Imagine being anywhere close to one-tenth as cynical as the sociopaths and, arguably, psychopaths involved with this stuff.
How many doses of the mRNA "vaccine" do you suppose Klaus Schwab, Biden and other world leaders, Rochelle Walensky, and Albert Bourla got? Actually I should omit Biden--they want him dead anyway so why not, and Walensky might be dumb enough by this point to believe whatever randomness erupts from her face at any time.
they cry in pain
"To most people, the concept of central bank ownership and their singular focus on maximizing usury and control is both boring and confusing to their minds."
Don't they most plenty deserve all we have got, are getting, and are going to get, then? 🎈
One may think of their innate, radical truth aversion and avoidance.
Even better: their innate aversion for the" weak", disarmed, innocent, and admiration for the "winners", first among all those who are best at telling them crafty lies and untruths.
There is also what a commenter wrote at Unz's: If money is your God, then who controls most of it is going to be your lord(s).
Yes, most people deserve to get what this system gives them good and hard. I don't really have much sympathy for them. The tragedy (as I see it) is that the few independent, free-thinking dissidents are subject to this system because they don't have the numbers or power to avoid its consequences. That and children suffer who havn't had a chance to choose their own path because the system destroys them...
JR -- reading the book I referenced in my comment may change your mind on the matter of genetic control of IQ. It did mine. As I've mentioned, genetic variation among humans is quite minimal. As to the intent of the 'elite' -- I don't think your evidence on that account is very firm. Maybe Klaus et al., will some day go on FOX and disclose their deepest thoughts, but my impression is that they are also under much stress and have suffered quite a major loss of IQ themselves.
"Of the remaining population, the elites will prefer to race mix them in order to lower average IQs down to 80-85 so they will be unable to challenge the elite’s power ever again, giving them permanent perpetual control." This isn't the way it works, though: it is not genetics but stress and epigenetics. For example, most of the early Russian Jewish immigrants to the US had low IQs in this range, but this phenotype disappeared quite rapidly due to the corrective influence of US economic conditions. Stress temporarily makes ANY person dumb. See Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Shafir, Eldar, 2013, Scarcity – The New Science of Having Less and How It Defines Our Lives: Henry Holt and Company, New York, 288 pages, for explanation of the mechanisms involved (summarized in https://larryturner.substack.com/p/the-vicious-cycle-of-scarcity-heres) - and https://developmentalsystem.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/1917-goddard.pdf (Mental tests and the immigrant, 1917) for Jewish Russian immigrant IQ test results. We are all (potentially, at least) Bozos on this planet.
Hi Larry, if I am understanding your point correctly, and please correct me if I am not, while I agree that environment (including nutrition, stress, war, etc) has a significant role in impacting IQ, and that improving the quality of environment has a significant effect on raising average group IQ, the scientific evidence is overwhelming that a significant part of intelligence is genetic.
To be clear, I am not an IQ supremacist; I believe that there are many different types of intelligence, and as I have quoted elsewhere from Maurice Samuel, "A simpleton may bring you salvation and a great philosopher may confound you." But I have provided evidence that our globohomo elite believe that by lowering average IQs it will provide them protection against usurpation of their rule.
The elephant in the room may be consciousness, viz. the stage of conscious awareness or evolved consciousness of a particular individual. The linked piece below references stages of consciousness using definitions articulated by Spiral Dynamics. The author’s thesis asserts consciousness is significantly correlated with intelligence. As a big fan of Spiral Dynamics, I agree.
https://brodoland.wordpress.com/2016/07/25/the-link-between-iq-and-conciousness/
Hi R. Toney, nice link, thank you for sharing and I agree with much of it. While it references the worldwide Flynn effect, note that western IQ has dropped by 14 points over the past 100 years even as it has risen elsewhere: https://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html . How much of this is due to immigration into the west is unclear.
Also, your link contains within it a well-worn Chomsky point, where he argues that regardless of any scientific proof of group IQ differences it is immoral and forbidden to even consider them. This is an essentially religious, dogmatic view (although Chomsky delusionally believes he is arguing from reason) that equality of outcome on a group basis must be enforced. brodoland's response is "it's not racist to follow the science so long as we allow equality of opportunity and not equality of outcome". Their views are not reconcilable....
(Note that Chomsky also argued that the unvaccinated should be completely excluded from society and his hope that they starve to death: https://news.yahoo.com/noam-chomsky-unvaccinated-remove-themselves-171900487.html )
1. The alleged rise of crypto and social credit score would only be bad because the government of the Washington empire is Christian and anti-White. There is nothing inherently wrong with such increased state control. Hitler would have used it to create beauty for sure.
2. Agenda 2030 is pure nonsense. Boomer scare. If it's real - why don't you support it? Any honest person would like to see either feet pics banned, or population decreased. Again, unless you're a boomer.
3. Reducing world population would be an absolute dream.
4. If the élites race-mix, then they will order their own death penalty. And the world will be conquered by those that keep their blood pure - my faith is in Juche Korea, of course.
> but a responsible leadership would never have allowed the world population to get as large as it has
All I see is a Christian world-order. Who owns the money is irrelevant if they all obey Jesus' commands. Ultimately, I would only support our gay overlord Klaus Schwab if he had decreased the population of India and Turkey, and gassed the Japanese. If he doesn't - he will be overthrown by the said Turks and Chinese.
I fail to see the end of the world, the advent of a technocratic feudal utopia, a one-world government. The Türks may now bow before the Americans, but they use it to commit a merry genocide against the Armenians - laughing their asses off while calling it a "climate action".
Your Georgia-Guidestones-esque chimaera is reminiscent of that Russian Armenian cultist Kurginyan's seeing Nazis in Latvia.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yl6IDtnQe9jo/
Hi Adunai, please correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem more comfortable with totaltarianism than I am.
It's not that I don't think huge, ultra-powerful governments dictating every aspect of our lives won't inevitably happen due to the "progress" of technology, nor do I necessarily think that changing our current leadership without a competing ideology using similar tactics is possible.
But as a guy who values individualism and being anti-groupthink, I see it as a catch-22: To defeat liberals in the game of politics one needs to adopt extensive propaganda tactics to control the NPC mind, which means generally de-emphasizing individualism and free thought/expression, which to me doesn’t seem morally correct. I quoted Hitler in one of my earlier posts where he bragged about getting Germans to about-face 180 degrees on issues at a moment’s notice based on the power of the media…I empathize with a free thinker like Junger who abstained from group action. I don’t know if there’s an answer to this conundrum. The incentive structure for the world is all wrong.
Re: the Christian world-order, I think you will find my post tomorrow delving into the origins of Christianity to be interesting.
Adunai:* We already live in a society, a culture that imprisons our thoughts and dictates our behaviours. Conversely, living alone won't achieve anything for anyone. So I fail to see the problematic.
It is impossible to "defeat the liberals" when their power structure remains intact. To destroy it, a nuclear war or an economical crysis is needed. Still, I fail to see any inkling of an anti-liberal message in the West. Maybe Andrew Tate? He's an anarchist, but slightly wilder.
Either way, I'd prefer to watch it crash and burn under the weight of its own idiocy.
P.S. Groupthink? Every thought is part of a particular "groupthink". The free-thinking people may merely choose a particular gramophone record to play, or mix them up. Why the constant penchant for "muh' freedom"? Sure, normies have always been cattle, but it's not like we "aristocrats" know the perfect answer to every question on earth.
Hi Adunai (name corrected above), it depends on what problem you are trying to solve for. If you are trying to solve for the achievement of political power, control over group action is imperative. But that is not my goal here; I am trying to see, once all the narrative lies are stripped away (which is a very difficult task), what is left, and what does it say about the nature of reality and the nature of God? My task is essentially religious in nature, even though it is arrived at via a strict observation of material reality.
Re: " I'd prefer to watch it crash and burn under the weight of its own idiocy", just keep in mind that all easily accessible energy sources have been mined and depleted; all the oil, gas, coal, rare minerals, etc we are extracting now require a tremendous amount of technological knowledge based on our level of civilizational achievements. It seems likely that if total collapse happens, civilization may never be able to restart again. Additionally, the problem with "accelerationists" is that they by-and-large are possessed by magical thinking; they think that (1) whatever emerges from the collapse scenario will favor their own subjective political utopia model and that (2) they themselves will emerge with much higher social status. In reality, in a true collapse scenario 99% of people will either starve to death or be victim of cannibal rape gangs.
On the first point, my view is essentially idealistic, I view history as a struggle as much racial materialistic as it is between the "gods". Cultural alchemy is the greatest mystery - what made Germany accept the teachings of Nietzsche and Haeckel, but England reject them? Or why industrialisation was realised in Japan but not in Korea/China?
Regarding the second point, it might be of ignorance, but I refuse to contemplate a global collapse. In the case of Russia, we already had one in the 1990s, and now another one. In the West proper, the transition might even be seamless to Brazil 2.0 which would seem like a collapse with hindsight, but not with a specific breaking point. And whatever husk remains, will get subsumed in a renovated culture such as the Eurabian Caliphate, and a return of Quetzalcoatl in America.
Ah, indeed, I tend to discard anything Aryan west of the Elbe as by and large lost for "our" cause. The last redoubt is set to be Pripetfestung.